BBC0%

Why The Odyssey has caused so much controversy 37%

By Nicholas Barber0%

6/27/2026, 10:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 428 hits. Analysis detected 3,327 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,526 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,930 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the article peer group.

Christopher Nolan's adaptation of Homer's Ancient Greek epic, starring Matt Damon, Zendaya and many more, is the most anticipated film of 2026  but also the most contested. 
Here's why. 
Christopher Nolan's last film, the Oscar-winning Oppenheimer, was about the invention of the atomic bomb, and the ethics of killing tens of thousands of civilians in a global conflict. 
All things considered, he must have thought that his next film would be a lot less controversial. 
After all, The Odyssey is based on Homer's ancient poem about warriors and kings, gods and monsters. 
What is there for anyone to grouse about? 
The height of Polyphemus the Cyclops? 
The wood used to make the Trojan horse? 
Well, maybe not. 
But it turns out that people have groused about pretty much everything else. 
The Odyssey, released in July, has become the most contentious film of the year  a lightning rod for all kinds of political and cultural grievances. 
What is it about a swords-and-sandals fantasy epic that is so upsetting? 
Casting controversies 
Much of the grumbling has consisted of conservative fears that the film might be too liberal. 
Not everyone approved when Nolan hired a transgender actor, Elliot Page, and a rapper, Travis Scott, to play a so-far-unidentified male character and the poet Demodocus, respectively. 
People have also objected to his choice of black actress Lupita Nyong'o to play Helen of Troy  described by Homer as "white-armed". 
Wolfgang Petersen's Homer adaptation, Troy (2004), loosely inspired by The Iliad, didn't have a vocal fanbase a year ago, but recently it's been held up by some on social media as superior to Nolan's, at least in its casting of Brad Pitt as Achilles and Diane Kruger as Helen. 
One right-wing blogger, Matt Walsh, declared that Nolan had cast a woman of Kenyan heritage as Helen because he was afraid of being called a racist. 
He didn't offer evidence of Nolan's supposed fears. 
And indeed the vast majority of the cast is white. 
But that didn't stop Elon Musk chiming in with his agreement. 
Some on social media, in response, accused Walsh and Musk of being bigoted. 
Others took a more scholarly approach. 
Prof Daniel Mendelsohn, whose translation of Homer's poem was published last year, said at the UK's Hay Festival in May that he was amused by "all of these bros suddenly worrying about Greek literature". 
According to a report in The Telegraph, Mendelsohn said: "What's so funny is that Helen has the tiniest role in The Odyssey… so the debate is particularly silly." 
But he proposed that Nyong'o's casting was "consonant with the concern of the Troy myth, which is how to think about beauty… I think [Nolan's] choice of this very beautiful actress who happens to be African lands you squarely in the middle of a very old discussion." 
"I wonder whether we have become inclined to treat mythological material as though it were historical material," Prof Susan Deacy, the author of The Greek Gods and Their Worlds, tells the BBC. 
"Yet the Odyssey is continually being reimagined, with pretty well every age producing its own Homer." 
In Elle magazine, Nyong'o gave her own pithy response to the attacks. 
"This is a mythological story," she said. 
"Our cast is representative of the world." 
But some people have pointed out that this isn't wholly true, lamenting the lack of Greeks among the actors. 
Greeks had been "left out by Hollywood, again and with no explanation, from our foundational mythologies and epics", wrote a Greek-British journalist, Chris Cotonou, in The Guardian. 
"If your film sets out to represent the world, wouldn't it be obvious to fill one space at this large, wonderfully multicultural table with the people who are most authentically connected to the source?" 
Not every criticism of The Odyssey has been explicitly conservative, then. 
When the first trailer was released in December, people sniped that the dark armour worn by Agamemnon (Benny Safdie) resembled Batman's costume, and that Odysseus's boat looked like a "Viking ship"  the implication being that films with giants and witches in them should nonetheless be as true-to-life as possible. 
The accents issue 
Another fuss arose from a trailer in which the actors  even the British ones  were heard to use American accents and modern colloquialisms. 
Exhibit A was Tom Holland saying, "My dad is coming home," in his Spider-Man voice, instead of intoning "father" in a manner befitting the Royal Shakespeare Company. 
"It sounds like they're trying to have an epic conversation on the sidewalk outside the Starbucks," cracked one commenter. 
"It felt so out of place," said another. 
"I'm hoping the dialogue isn't too contemporary and pulls the viewer out of the period." 
Christopher Nolan makes films in which the left can find endorsement as easily as the right, and frequently at the same time  Tom Shone 
This doesn't quite makes sense. 
Considering that the "place" is Greece and the "period" is thousands of years ago, the dialogue still wouldn't be true to Homer even it was slightly more pompous and old-fashioned. 
The fact is that the Ancient Greeks, whether real or mythological, didn't talk like 21st-Century American actors or 20th-Century British ones. 
But it's a time-honoured Hollywood convention that sword-wielding Greeks and Romans, much like wizards, Norse gods  and even some Nazi officers  should sound grandiose and English. 
"British accents in historical epics can feel right because of a long cinematic tradition," says Deacy, "not because they're any closer to ancient Greek speech." 
For that matter, she adds, formal dialogue isn't any closer to Homer than informal dialogue is. 
"More colloquial dialogue could even be closer to the spirit of Homeric storytelling than the elevated language that can be associated with antiquity  especially as the Odyssey was oral performance and popular entertainment, not just canonical text." 
Why this film has become a target 
So what's the problem? 
One answer is that people love to protest on social media if a film isn't exactly how they wanted it to be, and The Odyssey offers the biggest imaginable target. 
Nolan's films are significant cultural events  massively expensive, highly publicised and endlessly discussed  so anyone who gripes about them knows that someone will listen. 
And this one is adapted from one of the most important works of literature ever written, so anyone with even the vaguest knowledge of Greek mythology can have a view on it. 
Certainly, when Emily Wilson published her translation of The Odyssey in 2017, she was subject to what she has described as "misogynist trolling" for her modern wording, among other things. 
"I find it quite baffling. 
It's people who don't care about the poem, yet when it comes to this culture-war internet discourse, they perform anger about it and a protectiveness of it," she told Vulture this week. 
"It has to do with an idea of a totally stable notion of greatness and masculinity… Anything that challenges that interpretation of what ancient history is threatens their identity in terms of their gender and racial identities." 
More like this: 
 10 of the best films to watch this July 
 The violent, medieval origins of Robin Hood 
 Toy Story 5 is this year's most traumatic film - for parents 
It's significant, too, that Nolan is an unusual figure in the culture wars, says Tom Shone, the author of the definitive book on the director, The Nolan Variations. 
One quality that separates Nolan from his peers, Shone tells the BBC, is that his films' ideologies aren't always simple. 
"He's a Rorschach director. 
He makes films in which the left can find endorsement as easily as the right, and frequently at the same time." 
Imagery and rhetoric from his Batman trilogy, for instance, have been adopted by the right, so people of that political persuasion might feel betrayed that The Odyssey appears to be more progressive. 
"I think of all the blockbusters that provoke anti-woke sentiment  from Star Wars to The Little Mermaid  The Odyssey is the most painful for [conservatives] because on the surface at least Nolan films feel like they might skew rightward not left," says Shone. 
Nolan also makes films his own idiosyncratic way. 
Whether he's taking on Batman or World War Two or outer space, Nolan doesn't follow genre rules  and his defiantly distinctive approach can seem sacrilegious when he's taking on a text as revered as Homer's Odyssey. 
Still, the things which have prompted complaints about his new film are the things which should ensure that it's a hit. 
The Odyssey is already known for its colossal scale, its complexity, its literary pedigree and its uncompromising individuality. 
That's why people are criticising it, and that's why they will go to see it, too. 
The Odyssey is released on 17 July in US and UK cinemas. 
This article was amended on 27 June 
-- 
If you liked this story, sign up for The Essential List newsletter  a handpicked selection of features, videos and can't-miss news, delivered to your inbox twice a week. 
For more Culture stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook and Instagram. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.8%Nicholas Barber: 5.5%BBC: 3.0%Confirmation Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.9%BBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Nicholas Barber: 3.8%BBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic7.5%This article: 5.7%Nicholas Barber: 2.3%BBC: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic5.7%This article: 1.1%Nicholas Barber: 2.1%BBC: 1.1%Hindsight Bias1.1%This article: 2.5%Nicholas Barber: 2.0%BBC: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias2.5%This article: 2.0%Nicholas Barber: 6.6%BBC: 4.7%Framing Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.9%Nicholas Barber: 0.5%BBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.3%BBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.4%Nicholas Barber: 2.6%BBC: 3.6%Optimism Bias2.4%This article: 1.5%Nicholas Barber: 1.0%BBC: 0.9%Pessimism Bias1.5%This article: 25.6%Nicholas Barber: 8.0%BBC: 4.4%Negativity Bias25.6%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.7%BBC: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Nicholas Barber: 1.3%BBC: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error1.7%This article: 2.1%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias2.1%This article: 7.6%Nicholas Barber: 1.9%BBC: 1.0%In-Group Bias7.6%This article: 1.8%Nicholas Barber: 0.4%BBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.8%This article: 6.4%Nicholas Barber: 7.1%BBC: 4.6%Halo Effect6.4%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.6%BBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.2%Nicholas Barber: 2.3%BBC: 1.1%Recency Bias5.2%This article: 2.2%Nicholas Barber: 0.5%BBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Nicholas Barber: 1.1%BBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem5.6%This article: 4.8%Nicholas Barber: 0.7%BBC: 0.1%Straw Man4.8%This article: 11.4%Nicholas Barber: 5.6%BBC: 5.5%Appeal to Authority11.4%This article: 2.4%Nicholas Barber: 1.6%BBC: 1.1%False Dilemma2.4%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.3%BBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.2%BBC: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 28.0%Nicholas Barber: 7.9%BBC: 5.5%Hasty Generalization28.0%This article: 0.9%Nicholas Barber: 0.2%BBC: 0.1%Red Herring0.9%This article: 3.7%Nicholas Barber: 1.3%BBC: 0.7%Bandwagon3.7%This article: 7.9%Nicholas Barber: 3.8%BBC: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion7.9%This article: 5.2%Nicholas Barber: 0.9%BBC: 0.5%Begging the Question5.2%This article: 10.2%Nicholas Barber: 3.7%BBC: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.2%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.3%Nicholas Barber: 0.7%BBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof3.3%This article: 2.2%Nicholas Barber: 0.2%BBC: 0.6%Appeal to Nature2.2%This article: 1.8%Nicholas Barber: 0.4%BBC: 0.4%Composition/Division1.8%This article: 2.5%Nicholas Barber: 2.7%BBC: 3.5%Anecdotal2.5%This article: 2.2%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.2%This article: 11.3%Nicholas Barber: 1.4%BBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.3%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 1.6%Nicholas Barber: 0.2%BBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity1.6%This article: 2.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.2%BBC: 0.1%Special Pleading2.0%This article: 1.7%Nicholas Barber: 0.3%BBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy1.7%This article: 6.6%Nicholas Barber: 1.1%BBC: 1.2%Unattributed Quote6.6%This article: 2.2%Nicholas Barber: 0.9%BBC: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection2.2%This article: 9.2%Nicholas Barber: 11.0%BBC: 5.8%Biased Writer Voice9.2%This article: 0.1%Nicholas Barber: 0.7%BBC: 1.4%Indoctrination0.1%This article: 1.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Nicholas Barber: 3.0%BBC: 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.0%

1526 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers37%attributed speech959writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Walsh • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Mendelsohn • 34 words • 100.0% coverageThe Telegraph • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Mendelsohn • 47 words • 0.0% coverageSusan Deacy • 32 words • 0.0% coverageSusan Deacy • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageLupita Nyong'o • 7 words • 0.0% coverageLupita Nyong'o • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageChris Cotonou • 27 words • 0.0% coverageChris Cotonou • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageTom Shone • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageSusan Deacy • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSusan Deacy • 16 words • 100.0% coverageSusan Deacy • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Wilson • 5 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Wilson • 32 words • 100.0% coverageEmily Wilson • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageTom Shone • 28 words • 0.0% coverageTom Shone • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTom Shone • 4 words • 0.0% coverageTom Shone • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageTom Shone • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageBBC • 13 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Matt Walsh

100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words4.6% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+95.6 ptsWriter: 4.4%Matt Walsh: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-14.6 ptsWriter: 14.6%Matt Walsh: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.6 ptsWriter: 6.6%Matt Walsh: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Matt Walsh: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-0.2 ptsWriter: 0.2%Matt Walsh: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.