Keyword summary
⁠26%3 analyzed articles/videos3,102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Casting results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 1,822 hits. Analysis detected 16,138 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,960 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (34,406 of 37,536 keywords). This Casting is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Casting
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠9%Casting (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 21,960
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

8% percentile
02550751008.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles22K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos