Keyword summary
64% 46 analyzed articles/videos 55,645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Film results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 27,999 hits . Analysis detected 222,349 faulty-reasoning hits from 256,625 analyzed words across 46 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (31,275 of 35,179 keywords). This Film is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group. Film
Keyword details
Total words: 256,625
Article count: 46
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score46 analyzed articles256.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst