Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Mary Cunningham results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 257 hits . Analysis detected 2,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,898 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,602 authors). This Mary Cunningham is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Mary Cunningham
Author details
Total words: 2,898
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst