Author summary
ā 84% 1 analyzed article/video 906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Pulliam-Moore results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 854 hits . Analysis detected 3,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,718 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ā 88% (817 of 6,616 authors). This Charles Pulliam-Moore is worse (more manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group. Charles Pulliam-Moore
Author details
Total words: 2,718
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.7% percentile 6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 31.4% 31.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 23.4% 23.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 28.8% 28.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.4% 2.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 3.7% 3.7% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 28.8%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 23.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% No True Scotsman: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.1% Straw Man: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst