Author summary
48% 1 analyzed article/video 2,036 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jarek Paul Ervin results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 689 hits . Analysis detected 6,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,233 of 6,316 authors). This Jarek Paul Ervin is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Jarek Paul Ervin
Author details
Total words: 8,144
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst