Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Maren Thom results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Straw Man , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 449 hits . Analysis detected 1,983 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,922 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Maren Thom is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Maren Thom
Author details
Total words: 2,922
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.4% 15.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Straw Man: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 7.4%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% No True Scotsman: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst