Publication summary
26% 57 analyzed articles/videos 19,122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deadline results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 5,959 hits . Analysis detected 67,443 faulty-reasoning hits from 91,653 analyzed words across 57 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 24% (296 of 386 publications). This Deadline is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 91,653
Article count: 57
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score57 analyzed articles91.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst