Author summary
64% 2 analyzed articles/videos 208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glenn Garner results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 262 hits . Analysis detected 2,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,896 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,683 of 6,499 authors). This Glenn Garner is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Glenn Garner
Author details
Total words: 1,896
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.1% percentile 3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.8% 13.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 9.0% 9.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.2% 8.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst