Author summary
45% 6 analyzed articles/videos 576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Kanter results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 736 hits . Analysis detected 6,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,514 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (3,948 of 6,244 authors). This Jake Kanter is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group. Jake Kanter
Author details
Total words: 7,514
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst