Author summary
â 42% 2 analyzed articles/videos 914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter White results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 527 hits . Analysis detected 3,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,216 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of â 66% (2,235 of 6,484 authors). This Peter White is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Peter White
Author details
Total words: 3,216
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.4% 16.4% Attempt to Sell a Product⌠Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.1%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst