Deadline25%

Jacob Elordi On Filming 'Euphoria' Death Scene & Returning For Final Season: "I Think Sam Brought Me Back To Torture Me" 37%

By Armando Tinoco9%

7/22/2026, 12:40:10 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Actor-Observer Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 57.7% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 617 faulty-reasoning hits from 300 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.6% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,437 of 21,176 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the article peer group.

Jacob Elordi had a gruesome death on the final season of Euphoria and is giving insight into how that scene was shot. 
While making an appearance on ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live!, Elordi had a mini Euphoria reunion with co-star Colman Domingo, who is guest-hosting the late-night talk show in Kimmel’s absence. 
Domingo brought up his character’s death in the HBO series with the audience audibly letting out an “Aww.” 
“Thanks,” Elordi jokingly said to the audience. 
“Finally, after eight years of all of you saying, ‘F*** Nate, kill Nate, Nate’s a piece of sh**….’ 
Yeah, I read your tweets… Now you’re sad.” 
Elordi played high school bully Nate, who in Season 3 dealt with some goons who tormented him and brutally physically assaulted him. 
“I think Sam [Levinson] brought me back to torture me,” the actor said of the series creator. 
“It was like, six weeks of me just getting beat by a seven-foot guy. 
I was just running the whole time.” 
For filming his character’s death, Elordi explained, “I got locked in a coffin for two days straight with prosthetics and a fake tongue, and I couldn’t see out of my eyes. 
And then Sam put snakes into the coffin.” 
Of his reptilian co-star, Elordi said, “he had a very nice personality,” adding, “He was very docile and very sleepy. 
I don’t think he’d had a lot of sun  So I was kind of nudging him, trying to get him to get active and do the scene, because he was meant to be threatening. 
But he was like a little dog. 
He just kept curling up at my feet.” 
Watch Elordi’s full interview in the video below. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.7%Armando Tinoco: 1.4%Deadline: 2.3%Confirmation Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.2%Deadline: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Armando Tinoco: 5.2%Deadline: 3.3%Availability Heuristic10.7%This article: 7.3%Armando Tinoco: 0.3%Deadline: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic7.3%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.2%Deadline: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.3%Deadline: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 5.5%Deadline: 6.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.1%Deadline: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 1.1%Deadline: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Armando Tinoco: 1.7%Deadline: 2.6%Optimism Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.6%Deadline: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 57.7%Armando Tinoco: 10.9%Deadline: 6.1%Negativity Bias57.7%This article: 5.7%Armando Tinoco: 2.2%Deadline: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 11.7%Armando Tinoco: 0.4%Deadline: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias11.7%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Armando Tinoco: 3.9%Deadline: 6.4%Halo Effect9.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.0%Armando Tinoco: 1.4%Deadline: 1.3%Recency Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.5%Deadline: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.5%Deadline: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 3.1%Deadline: 4.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 5.5%Deadline: 3.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.8%Deadline: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.3%Deadline: 0.9%Bandwagon6.0%This article: 8.7%Armando Tinoco: 4.2%Deadline: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion8.7%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.3%Deadline: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 14.3%Armando Tinoco: 1.2%Deadline: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.3%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 6.7%Armando Tinoco: 0.2%Deadline: 0.1%Appeal to Nature6.7%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 32.3%Armando Tinoco: 2.1%Deadline: 1.4%Anecdotal32.3%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.8%Deadline: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 2.5%Deadline: 3.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 7.0%Armando Tinoco: 3.6%Deadline: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection7.0%This article: 6.0%Armando Tinoco: 5.9%Deadline: 6.4%Biased Writer Voice6.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.8%Deadline: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Armando Tinoco: 0.5%Deadline: 2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.7%

300 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker60%attributed speech120writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageJacob Elordi • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Elordi • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Elordi • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Elordi • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Elordi • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Elordi • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Elordi • 31 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Elordi • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Elordi • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Elordi • 35 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Elordi • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Elordi • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jacob Elordi

96%flagged-word coverage
180 attributed words100% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Quote-first Misdirection-17.5 ptsWriter: 17.5%Jacob Elordi: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.0 ptsWriter: 15.0%Jacob Elordi: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.7 ptsWriter: 6.7%Jacob Elordi: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.