Topic summary
48% 3 analyzed articles/videos 722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Actors results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Availability Heuristic , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 470 hits . Analysis detected 2,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,006 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (8,438 of 16,559 topics). This Actors is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Actors
Topic details
Total words: 3,006
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.0% percentile 2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.6% 15.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst