Topic summary
48%3 analyzed articles/videos722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Actors results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 470 hits. Analysis detected 2,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,006 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (8,438 of 16,559 topics). This Actors is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Actors
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,006
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.3%14.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.6%15.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate