Topic summary
49% 16 analyzed articles/videos 14,553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interviews results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 5,992 hits . Analysis detected 40,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 64,787 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (15,416 of 15,762 topics). This Interviews is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group. Interviews
Topic details
Total words: 64,787
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.2% percentile 1.2% BS Score16 analyzed articles64.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst