Author summary
69%1 analyzed article/video2,356 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zach Oden results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 751 hits. Analysis detected 5,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,765 of 6,298 authors). This Zach Oden is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Zach Oden
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
41%Zach Oden (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,068
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

40% percentile
025507510040.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos