Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video270 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Elordi results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Actor-Observer Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 70.5 hits. Analysis detected 364.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 270 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,378 of 28,364 speakers). This Jacob Elordi is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Jacob Elordi
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠7%Jacob Elordi (selected)8%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 270
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751007.0% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos270 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 0.6%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos