San Jose man arrested on murder charge after woman found dead in apartment ⁠6%

By KTVU Staff⁠15%

7/21/2026, 8:46:19 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Anchoring Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 139 faulty-reasoning hits from 217 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 21.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (19,459 of 20,517 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.80% of the article peer group.

A 22-year-old San Jose man has been arrested on suspicion of murder after a woman was found unresponsive inside a San Jose apartment last week, authorities said. 
Marco Angel Jimenez was booked into the Santa Clara County Main Jail in connection with the death of 22-year-old Achilles Davis, who was also known as Priscilla Lynn Davis, according to the San Jose Police Department. 
Police were called around 1 a.m. 
Wednesday to the 2100 block of Lanai Avenue after receiving a report of an unresponsive woman, police spokeswoman Stacie Shih said. 
Officers arrived and found Davis inside the apartment. 
She was pronounced dead at the scene. 
At the time of her death, the Santa Clara County Medical Examiner's Office found no visible signs of trauma beyond minor injuries, Shih said. 
However, the following day, the medical examiner ruled Davis' manner of death a homicide. 
Her exact cause of death remains under investigation. 
Jimenez was initially located at the scene as a person of interest before investigators later arrested him during the course of the homicide investigation, police said. 
Authorities said Jimenez and Davis knew each other but have not disclosed the nature of their relationship or released additional details about the circumstances surrounding the killing. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.4%KTVU Staff: 2.7%KTVU: 4.0%Confirmation Bias12.4%This article: 12.0%KTVU Staff: 1.1%KTVU: 0.9%Anchoring Bias12.0%This article: 11.1%KTVU Staff: 7.1%KTVU: 3.7%Availability Heuristic11.1%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.5%KTVU Staff: 0.6%KTVU: 0.6%Hindsight Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%KTVU Staff: 4.6%KTVU: 8.5%Framing Effect6.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 4.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%KTVU Staff: 0.3%KTVU: 1.5%Pessimism Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 4.4%KTVU: 7.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 3.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.5%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.4%KTVU: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 7.8%KTVU: 4.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 2.9%KTVU: 3.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 12.4%KTVU Staff: 2.0%KTVU: 1.0%Burden of Proof12.4%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 4.8%KTVU: 3.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 5.6%KTVU: 2.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.5%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 5.2%KTVU: 3.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.7%KTVU: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 1.9%KTVU: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.9%KTVU: 1.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU Staff: 0.0%KTVU: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

217 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers46%attributed speech117writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageSan Jose Police Department • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageStacie Shih • 24 words • 0.0% coverageStacie Shih • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coveragepolice said • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Stacie Shih

100%flagged-word coverage
38 attributed words38% of attributed speech64% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.