Author summary
9% 18 analyzed articles/videos 5,133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samantha Genzer results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 1,612 hits . Analysis detected 12,112 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,828 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 4% (5,980 of 6,170 authors). This Samantha Genzer is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group. Samantha Genzer
Author details
Total words: 25,828
Article count: 18
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.1% percentile 1.1% BS Score18 analyzed articles25.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst