Mass. sees 'normal' levels in cases of the explosive diarrhea parasite, DPH says 14%

By Samantha Genzer10%

7/15/2026, 3:10:47 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 531 faulty-reasoning hits from 404 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30% and a BS Rank of 14% (19,018 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the article peer group.

Mass. sees 'normal' levels in cases of the explosive diarrhea parasite, DPH says 
State officials say the next update of reported cases  which currently sits at 18 from May 1 to July 1  will be available in the first week of August. 
Significant buzz has built up since the cyclospora parasite, known to cause explosive diarrhea, was officially detected in Massachusetts this summer. 
While Midwestern states are currently dealing with an outbreak of the parasite, state officials say Massachusetts is not seeing a surge of reported cases. 
“There is no evidence currently that the outbreak of Cyclospora affecting multiple Midwestern states is affecting Massachusetts,” a state Department of Public Health spokesperson told Boston.com Wednesday. 
“We are seeing a normal seasonal amount of cyclosporiasis so far this year.” 
Between May 1 and July 1, 18 cases of cyclosporiasis  the infection caused by cyclospora  were reported in Massachusetts residents, according to DPH. 
“This is in line with the normal number of cases seen in Massachusetts during this time frame,” the spokesperson said. 
According to DPH data, the parasite was detected 74 times in Massachusetts residents in 2025, following 84 reported cases in 2024. 
During a spring and summer outbreak in 2019, Massachusetts documented more than 100 cases of cyclosporiasis. 
While seasonal increases in cases are typical at this time of year, DPH officials said they expect to see additional cases because diagnosis does not always happen promptly after symptoms begin. 
State officials will update Massachusetts’ online surveillance database in the first week of August to reflect cases reported from May through August, DPH said. 
The parasite is spread through contaminated food or water and treatable with antibiotics. 
Its symptoms include watery diarrhea, weight loss, bloating, cramps, nausea, vomiting, exhaustion, and a fever. 
Some infected with cyclospora do not experience symptoms, according to DPH. 
To investigate outbreaks, DPH works with local health boards, which receive individual reports based on residency and interview patients about their food history. 
DPH epidemiologists continuously review this data to identify clusters linked to common exposures, officials said. 
Previous outbreaks in the U.S. have been linked to fresh produce, such as raspberries, fresh basil, cilantro, scallions, snow peas, and bagged salads. 
DPH officials recommend washing fresh produce before eating to help avoid infection, but they caution that doing so might not fully prevent contracting the disease. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.7%Samantha Genzer: 1.8%Boston.com: 2.2%Confirmation Bias6.7%This article: 7.7%Samantha Genzer: 1.2%Boston.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias7.7%This article: 10.9%Samantha Genzer: 2.0%Boston.com: 3.0%Availability Heuristic10.9%This article: 5.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.8%Boston.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic5.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.3%Boston.com: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Samantha Genzer: 1.3%Boston.com: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias3.7%This article: 6.4%Samantha Genzer: 3.4%Boston.com: 5.7%Framing Effect6.4%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.9%Boston.com: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.2%Samantha Genzer: 0.6%Boston.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.2%Boston.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%Samantha Genzer: 2.0%Boston.com: 2.0%Optimism Bias6.2%This article: 7.7%Samantha Genzer: 1.1%Boston.com: 1.2%Pessimism Bias7.7%This article: 9.7%Samantha Genzer: 4.2%Boston.com: 6.2%Negativity Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.5%Boston.com: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.4%Boston.com: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.8%Boston.com: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 1.5%Boston.com: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.2%Samantha Genzer: 1.2%Boston.com: 1.4%Recency Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.2%Boston.com: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.4%Samantha Genzer: 2.8%Boston.com: 3.8%Appeal to Authority10.4%This article: 5.9%Samantha Genzer: 1.1%Boston.com: 1.1%False Dilemma5.9%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.5%Boston.com: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.7%Samantha Genzer: 1.8%Boston.com: 3.1%Hasty Generalization9.7%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.2%Boston.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.4%Boston.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.9%Samantha Genzer: 6.8%Boston.com: 6.2%Appeal to Emotion8.9%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.6%Boston.com: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.7%Samantha Genzer: 1.1%Boston.com: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.7%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.3%Boston.com: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 1.1%Boston.com: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.2%Samantha Genzer: 1.3%Boston.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.2%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 1.3%Boston.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.6%Boston.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.2%Samantha Genzer: 1.0%Boston.com: 3.8%Biased Writer Voice5.2%This article: 6.2%Samantha Genzer: 1.9%Boston.com: 1.3%Indoctrination6.2%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 1.0%Boston.com: 2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

404 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker29%attributed speech285writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Public Health • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Public Health • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Public Health • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Public Health • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Public Health • 25 words • 100.0% coverage
81%flagged-word coverage
119 attributed words100% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Indoctrination+21.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Department of Public Health: 21.0%21.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.4 ptsWriter: 7.4%Department of Public Health: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.