Speaker summary
68% 4 analyzed articles/videos 304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Department of Public Health results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 81.097 hits . Analysis detected 392.097 faulty-reasoning hits from 304 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,122 of 28,364 speakers). This Department of Public Health is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group. Department of Public Health
Speaker details
Total words: 304
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.4% percentile 10.0% BS Score4 analyzed videos304 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 24.8% 24.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 26.7% 26.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst