Author summary
45%1 analyzed article/video930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Audrey Tomlin results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 344 hits. Analysis detected 2,199 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,482 of 6,347 authors). This Audrey Tomlin is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Audrey Tomlin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
30%Audrey Tomlin (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,720
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

29% percentile
025507510029.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.1%0.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos