Publication summary
58% 10 analyzed articles/videos 13,503 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco Public Press results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 3,386 hits . Analysis detected 25,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,796 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 17% (335 of 399 publications). This San Francisco Public Press is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. San Francisco Public Press Publication details
Total words: 41,796
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score10 analyzed articles41.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst