Author summary
67% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,043 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madison Alvarado results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Pessimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 705 hits . Analysis detected 5,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,129 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (5,054 of 6,628 authors). This Madison Alvarado is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Madison Alvarado
Author details
Total words: 9,129
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst