Author summary
49%2 analyzed articles/videos2,550 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sylvie Sturm results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 668 hits. Analysis detected 4,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,650 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 11% (5,574 of 6,213 authors). This Sylvie Sturm is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Sylvie Sturm
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
11%Sylvie Sturm (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,650
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

10% percentile
025507510010.3% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate