Author summary
16%4 analyzed articles/videos1,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Filbin results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 503 hits. Analysis detected 3,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,578 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,520 of 6,628 authors). This Patrick Filbin is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Patrick Filbin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
17%Patrick Filbin (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,578
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

17% percentile
025507510016.7% percentile
1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate