Author summary
42% 13 analyzed articles/videos 2,360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These LoCO Staff results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,350 hits . Analysis detected 9,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,136 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,684 of 6,628 authors). This LoCO Staff is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group. LoCO Staff
Author details
Total words: 14,136
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score13 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst