Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video63 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evan Motlong results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Representativeness Heuristic, and Unattributed Quote, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 168 faulty-reasoning hits from 63 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,483 of 28,364 speakers). This Evan Motlong is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Evan Motlong
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 63
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
41.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos63 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 54.8%54.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 27.4%27.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 45.2%45.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 22.6%22.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 54.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 45.2%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos