Topic summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Attack results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 301 faulty-reasoning hits from 375 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,281 of 16,562 topics). This Animal Attack is worse (more manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.
Animal Attack
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 375
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510092.3% percentile
10.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles375 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.1%29.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos