Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Denise Davis results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Quote-first Misdirection, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 63.6% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 260.274 faulty-reasoning hits from 132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,651 of 28,364 speakers). This Denise Davis is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Denise Davis
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
37.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos132 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 63.6%63.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 60.8%60.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 63.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 60.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos