Author summary
33% 2 analyzed articles/videos 634 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Garcia results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Unattributed Quote , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 150 hits . Analysis detected 1,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,902 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,764 of 6,244 authors). This Matthew Garcia is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group. Matthew Garcia
Author details
Total words: 1,902
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.7% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst