Author summary
88% 2 analyzed articles/videos 146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Choi results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.8% saturation with 554 hits . Analysis detected 3,185 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,922 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 89% (720 of 6,171 authors). This Justin Choi is worse (more manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. Justin Choi
Author details
Total words: 1,922
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.3% percentile 6.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 15.7% 15.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.7% 23.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.1% 12.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.7% 6.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 28.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 10.2%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst