Topic summary
13% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Storms results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 696 hits . Analysis detected 3,850 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,992 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (12,796 of 15,634 topics). This Storms is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Storms
Topic details
Total words: 7,992
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst