Author summary
72% 16 analyzed articles/videos 6,306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leonard Greene results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 4,852 hits . Analysis detected 27,797 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,038 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,491 of 6,530 authors). This Leonard Greene is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Leonard Greene
Author details
Total words: 34,038
Article count: 16
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score16 analyzed articles34K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst