Author summary
⁠31%2 analyzed articles/videos1,766 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fallon Roth results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 491 hits. Analysis detected 3,776 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,042 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (4,693 of 6,362 authors). This Fallon Roth is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Fallon Roth
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠27%Fallon Roth (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,042
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

26% percentile
025507510026.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos