Keyword summary
50% 5 analyzed articles/videos 691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Hill Country Floods results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,265 hits . Analysis detected 8,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,327 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (29,590 of 34,692 keywords). This Texas Hill Country Floods is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group. Texas Hill Country Floods
Keyword details
Total words: 12,327
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst