WTOP32%

Texas is drenched by heavy rains as forecasters warn that more storms could bring dangerous floods 36%

By WTOP Staff31%

7/15/2026, 12:55:55 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 410 faulty-reasoning hits from 293 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (13,255 of 20,518 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the article peer group.

Heavy downpours in South Texas washed out highways and stranded motorists Tuesday as forecasters warned that a threat of more severe weather could bring dangerous flooding to already drenched counties near the border with Mexico. 
Storms dumped up to a foot of rain in some rural areas of Texas, leading to dozens of high-water rescues across the region and officials shutting down portions of a busy highway for hours near Uvalde, about 80 miles (129 kilometers) west of San Antonio. 
A flood watch also included Kerr County, where catastrophic flooding last year along the Guadalupe River killed more than 100 people . 
No deaths or injuries Tuesday were immediately reported. 
The National Weather Service warned that storms overnight could dump more than a foot of additional rain to some places into Wednesday, creating potentially catastrophic impacts from flash flooding in areas west of San Antonio. 
Texas Gov. 
Greg Abbott issued a disaster declaration for dozens of counties. 
“Intense rain rates and compounding effects from multiple rounds of storms will result in a dangerous flash flooding threat through Thursday,” the National Weather Service said. 
Authorities on Tuesday posted videos of a rescue crew in a boat down flooded streets and one vehicle being swept away by fast-moving waters. 
Five people were rescued by members of the Texas Game Warden Search and Rescue Team and four were rescued by a local game warden, said Maggie Berger, a spokesperson for the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 
In Uvalde, officials said there had been at least two dozen water rescues. 
They opened a local event center for anyone displaced by flooding. 
In Sabinal, officials were also making plans for a shelter. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 3.1%WTOP: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.8%WTOP: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%WTOP Staff: 3.6%WTOP: 3.5%Availability Heuristic15.7%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 1.1%WTOP: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.6%WTOP: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 1.3%WTOP: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 20.8%WTOP Staff: 8.6%WTOP: 8.5%Framing Effect20.8%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.3%WTOP: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.6%WTOP: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.2%WTOP: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 1.8%WTOP: 1.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 17.4%WTOP Staff: 1.8%WTOP: 1.8%Pessimism Bias17.4%This article: 26.3%WTOP Staff: 8.5%WTOP: 8.9%Negativity Bias26.3%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 1.1%WTOP: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.9%WTOP: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.2%WTOP: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.8%WTOP: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.4%WTOP: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 3.2%WTOP: 3.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.1%WTOP: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.5%WTOP Staff: 1.2%WTOP: 1.4%Recency Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.2%WTOP: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.3%WTOP: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.1%WTOP: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 27.6%WTOP Staff: 4.7%WTOP: 4.6%Appeal to Authority27.6%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 1.2%WTOP: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.6%WTOP: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.1%WTOP: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 3.1%WTOP: 3.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.1%WTOP: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.5%WTOP: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 4.4%WTOP: 4.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.6%WTOP: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.5%WTOP Staff: 2.4%WTOP: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.5%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.6%WTOP: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.2%WTOP: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.1%WTOP: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.2%WTOP Staff: 1.4%WTOP: 1.3%Anecdotal8.2%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.1%WTOP: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 2.4%WTOP: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.1%WTOP: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 1.6%WTOP: 1.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 8.9%WTOP Staff: 1.1%WTOP: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection8.9%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 4.3%WTOP: 4.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.6%WTOP: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 1.2%WTOP: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.4%WTOP: 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WTOP Staff: 0.2%WTOP: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

293 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers37%attributed speech186writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageThe National Weather Service • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 10 words • 0.0% coverageThe National Weather Service • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMaggie Berger • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
61 attributed words57% of attributed speech52% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Quote-first Misdirection+42.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%The National Weather Service: 42.6%42.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.