Topic summary
56% 9 analyzed articles/videos 6,160 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Disaster Response results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 3,198 hits . Analysis detected 19,760 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,882 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (13,105 of 15,951 topics). This Disaster Response is better (less manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group. Disaster Response
Topic details
Total words: 22,882
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score9 analyzed articles22.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst