Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 979 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Otis results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 340 hits . Analysis detected 2,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,109 of 6,362 authors). This John Otis is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. John Otis
Author details
Total words: 3,916
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst