Publication summary
0% 40 analyzed articles/videos 27,946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Colorado Public Radio results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 22,011 hits . Analysis detected 133,207 faulty-reasoning hits from 82,346 analyzed words across 40 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 83% (68 of 379 publications). This Colorado Public Radio is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 82,346
Article count: 40
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.3% percentile 3.4% BS Score40 analyzed articles82.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 13.0% 13.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 6.5% 6.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 26.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 19.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 13.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 11.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst