Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Mulholland results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.8% saturation with 268 hits . Analysis detected 1,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 729 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of 96% (313 of 6,628 authors). This Sarah Mulholland is worse (more manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group. Sarah Mulholland
Author details
Total words: 729
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.3% percentile 10.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles729 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 26.9% 26.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 24.7% 24.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 36.8% 36.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 10.2% 10.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.4% 10.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 7.4% 7.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 36.8%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 26.9%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 24.7%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 18.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Middle Ground: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst