Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Daley results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 1,005 hits . Analysis detected 4,502 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,755 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of 93% (447 of 6,359 authors). This John Daley is worse (more manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group. John Daley
Author details
Total words: 2,755
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.0% percentile 8.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 19.5% 19.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 36.5% 36.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 13.6% 13.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 10.0% 10.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 14.7% 14.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 36.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.9%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 19.5%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 14.7%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst