Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,022 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Warner results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 380 hits . Analysis detected 4,366 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,867 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,075 of 6,225 authors). This Ryan Warner is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group. Ryan Warner
Author details
Total words: 7,867
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst