Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,801 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Burnett results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 251 hits. Analysis detected 2,233 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (6,158 of 6,244 authors). This John Burnett is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group.
John Burnett
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠2%John Burnett (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,204
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

1% percentile
02550751001.4% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos