Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hayley Sanchez results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 485 hits . Analysis detected 3,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,523 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,073 of 6,628 authors). This Hayley Sanchez is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Hayley Sanchez
Author details
Total words: 2,523
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.8% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 13.9% 13.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 9.1% 9.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.8% 3.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.0%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst