Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,053 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shanna Lewis results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42% saturation with 1,327 hits . Analysis detected 6,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,159 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 89% (720 of 6,196 authors). This Shanna Lewis is worse (more manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group. Shanna Lewis
Author details
Total words: 3,159
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.4% percentile 6.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 42.0% 42.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 20.4% 20.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 18.5% 18.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 42.0%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 20.4%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 18.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 15.8%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Author 10.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Nature: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst