Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video701 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Hesse results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.4% saturation with 680 hits. Analysis detected 4,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,102 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 91% (594 of 6,244 authors). This Tom Hesse is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
Tom Hesse
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
91%Tom Hesse (selected)8%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,102
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

91% percentile
025507510090.5% percentile
7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 21.3%21.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 13.4%13.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.5%8.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 9.3%9.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.2%12.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 12.8%12.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 8.2%8.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 32.4%32.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 32.4%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Author 21.3%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.7%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Middle Ground: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos