Dec. 26, 2025: A Kwanzaa extravaganza and a singer who lives the principles everyday!⁠96%

By Chandra Thomas Whitfield⁠0%

12/26/2025, 10:13:25 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 342 faulty-reasoning hits from 70 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 93.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (855 of 20,472 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 95.80% of the article peer group.

This is the first day of Kwanzaa, a celebration of African American culture and heritage along with seven guiding principles, such as unity, purpose, and self-determination. 
Light the kinara with us as we share some of our favorite Kwanzaa memories from our annual Colorado Matters Holiday Extravaganzas! 
Plus, Chandra's conversation from August with Denver musical artist Such, whose passion to help others has been a guiding principle in her life. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 7.0%Colorado Public Radio: 4.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 30.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 8.7%Colorado Public Radio: 6.4%Availability Heuristic30.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 32.9%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 9.5%Colorado Public Radio: 5.7%Confirmation Bias32.9%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 100.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 64.0%Colorado Public Radio: 26.7%Framing Effect100.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 32.9%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 52.2%Colorado Public Radio: 5.0%Halo Effect32.9%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 67.1%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 55.9%Colorado Public Radio: 7.6%In-Group Bias67.1%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 4.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 15.5%Colorado Public Radio: 19.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 37.1%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 32.9%Colorado Public Radio: 6.6%Optimism Bias37.1%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 4.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 5.4%Colorado Public Radio: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 10.1%Colorado Public Radio: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 4.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 2.9%Colorado Public Radio: 3.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 32.9%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 4.8%Colorado Public Radio: 1.7%Ad Hominem32.9%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 30.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 18.6%Colorado Public Radio: 3.9%Anecdotal30.0%This article: 32.9%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 36.9%Colorado Public Radio: 11.3%Appeal to Authority32.9%This article: 30.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 52.8%Colorado Public Radio: 13.0%Appeal to Emotion30.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.5%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 30.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 29.0%Colorado Public Radio: 1.9%Bandwagon30.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 1.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.1%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 32.9%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 4.8%Colorado Public Radio: 1.0%Genetic Fallacy32.9%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 10.4%Colorado Public Radio: 3.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 5.2%Colorado Public Radio: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 2.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.6%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandra Thomas Whitfield: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%

70 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.