Topic summary
57%3 analyzed articles/videos1,580 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Local Music results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 485 hits. Analysis detected 4,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,740 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 38% (9,861 of 15,760 topics). This Local Music is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Local Music
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,740
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.2%10.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate