Author summary
69%14 analyzed articles/videos6,057 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ella Jackson results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 2,687 hits. Analysis detected 26,506 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,325 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (4,736 of 6,169 authors). This Ella Jackson is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Ella Jackson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
24%Ella Jackson (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 29,325
Article count: 14
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score14 analyzed articles29.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.4%5.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate