Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harriet Sinclair results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 564 hits . Analysis detected 4,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,252 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (4,964 of 6,359 authors). This Harriet Sinclair is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. Harriet Sinclair
Author details
Total words: 7,252
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst